Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Lawrence Lewis - Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer

Question: In 2007 I was accused of sexual battery by an adult girl. The investigator on the case wanted me to come "talk" to him. I asked if I was under arrest, he said no. So I didn`t speak to him. Now, in 2011, the came out to my house and arrested me, with a warrant. The obtained a search warrant for my DNA and swabbed my cheeks. What I am not understanding, is why this is taking so long to now come to a head. I have gotten tickets and other dealings with the police since 2007 and this warrant was never brought up, which makes me wonder when the warrant was issued, if it was issued any time in 2007 or 2008, why was I not picked up then? Do I have any "defense" in the statute of limitations or speedy trial type avenues? I have not been "in hiding" and have lived in the state continuously as well.

Answer: True, you were not in hiding, but you were also NOT trying to "talk" to the investigator. So, it took the amount of time it needed to take without your cooperation. I suspect that you are not charged with sexual battery, but aggravated sexual battery, because they took your DNA. The statute of limitation on aggravated sexual battery is seven years. So, that is NOT an issue. As to speedy trial demands, you arenot entitled to a speedy trial demand until you are arrested. You just got arrested, so that is NOT an issue either. I`m curious are you really complaining about how long things took, when you did NOT cooperate. Not that you have to cooperate. But are you rellay complaining

Answered By Lawrence Lewis - Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer

1 comment:

  1. I was very pleased to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out the new stuff you post.

    LA Criminal Defense Attorney

    ReplyDelete

About Me

I hung a shingle in February 2000, because I saw that individuals charged with criminal offenses were being underserved by the attorneys practicing criminal law. Since February 2000, I have represented more than two thousand criminal clients. I only practice criminal law, but I do everything from violations of probation to Supreme Court appeals. There are few attorneys under the age of sixty that have my level of experience. I have tried more than two hundred major felony jury trials. I have tried more than fifty misdemeanor jury trials. In Philadelphia as a prosecutor, I tried more than two thousand bench trials. I have conducted more than three thousand preliminary hearings and bond hearings. Yet, I still have the energy at forty-five to serve my current clients. There is nothing that will occur in a courtroom that I have not experienced before. When you are looking for an attorney, experience is everything.