Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Pre-Trial Hearings

A pretrial conference is a meeting of the parties to a case conducted prior to trial. The conference is held before the trial judge or a magistrate, a judicial officer who possesses fewer judicial powers than a judge. A pretrial conference may be held prior to trial in both civil and criminal cases. A pretrial conference may be requested by a party to a case, or it may be ordered by the court. Generally, the term pretrial conference is used interchangeably with the term pretrial hearing.

A pretrial conference may be conducted for several reasons: (1) expedite disposition of the case, (2) help the court establish managerial control over the case, (3) discourage wasteful pretrial activities, (4) improve the quality of the trial with thorough preparation, and (5) facilitate a settlement of the case.

Pretrial conferences are conducted in criminal cases to decide matters that do not inquire into the defendant''s guilt or innocence.   In Georgia, state courts use the pretrial conference in criminal cases to decide such preliminary matters as what evidence will be excluded from trial and what witnesses will be allowed to testify.  The pretrial conference is where the defense attorney has the opportunity to argue any motions to exclude certain prejudicial evidence (i.e. motions to suppress).

Generally, the substance of a pretrial conference for a criminal case is the same as that for a civil case.  At the conference the judge or magistrate may make rulings on pre-trial motions, eliminate repetitive evidence, and set schedules.  If a preliminary issue arises after the pretrial conference, a party may request a special pretrial hearing with the court to address the issue.  Typically, whatever is not addressed at the pretrial hearing is resolved in court on the first day of trial, out of the presence of the jury, in a motion in limine.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

I hung a shingle in February 2000, because I saw that individuals charged with criminal offenses were being underserved by the attorneys practicing criminal law. Since February 2000, I have represented more than two thousand criminal clients. I only practice criminal law, but I do everything from violations of probation to Supreme Court appeals. There are few attorneys under the age of sixty that have my level of experience. I have tried more than two hundred major felony jury trials. I have tried more than fifty misdemeanor jury trials. In Philadelphia as a prosecutor, I tried more than two thousand bench trials. I have conducted more than three thousand preliminary hearings and bond hearings. Yet, I still have the energy at forty-five to serve my current clients. There is nothing that will occur in a courtroom that I have not experienced before. When you are looking for an attorney, experience is everything.